Sunday, September 26, 2010

Palaeoporn 18

It's not size, but form that counts.


Look, I'm sorry about this. It's quite embarrassing, I know. But in my defense, I have blurred the naked Dickinsonia at the top right of the slab so as not to offend any sensibilities.

Anyhow, on to the real subject of this Palaeoporn, the structure with the highly descriptive and emotive name - "Form D". Yeah . . . "Form D" . . . no, honestly!

The Form D is the . . . um . . . rather flaccid structure above the compass. Form D was the name given to a group of thick, long, trace fossils of unknown origin. While they are not common, it doesn't take much poking about to expose them.

Given the lack of structure it was hard to attribute a source for the traces (they are not ribbed for example) thus making it difficult to erect a reasonable phylogeny and nomenclature. So they got stuck with the name "Form D" - as they were the fourth type of trace structures to be catagorised. Recently, they are thought to be, not trace fossils, but body parts. They appear to be association with the form Phyllozoon.

Phyllozoon Hanseni (yellow arrows) and Form D (blue arrows)
from the Ediacaran of Canada.


Phyllozoon is a more-or-less bisymmetrical leaf-shaped structure composed of a series of 'tubes' which meet at a central zigzag suture. There seems to have been only one layer of tubes forming the 'vanes' of the frond, with a stiff outer covering. Numerous individuals are commonly scattered over bedding planes, sometimes overlapping. The fronds have obvious polarity (top and bottom) and their common association with Form D is too frequent to be chance. It is possible that Form D is actually the stolon to which the Phyllozoon fronds were attached. They may well have looked something like this below, except Phyllozoon probably wasn't green.

The alga Caulerpa taxifolia doing a passable imitation of Phyllozoon. Photo credit.

I suppose we should be grateful that Phyllozoon wasn't called Phallozoon . . .

2 comments:

  1. Since you are very knowledgeable about Ediacaran biota, can I ask you to look at some of my discoveries at the following facebook albums:

    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1444203318&v=wall&story_fbid=158727657478477&il=0&ref=notif&notif_t=share_reply#!/album.php?aid=17455&id=540316588

    and,

    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1444203318&v=wall&story_fbid=158727657478477&il=0&ref=notif&notif_t=share_reply#!/album.php?aid=209933&id=540316588

    Also, can you help me on this? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I guess the anthropomorphic principle applies to the geo sciences as much as any others. One doesn't have to be serious all the time. Even that crazy Chariots of the Gods bunk helped make geology interesting.Thanks for the article.

    ReplyDelete

Sorry to use registration, but the site is plagued with link spanners. Please either sign in or send your comment by email and I'll add it to the site.