Ediacaran goes back to its roots with this Palaeoporn, with probably the most enigmatic of a group of enigmatics, Tribrachidium heraldicum.
Tribrachidium (photo credit) |
The tripartite body plan of Tribrachidium is quite unusual as most metazoans are either bilaterally or radially symmetrical.
So what is it? Well Tribrachidium is a cnidarian. Umm no, actually it's a lophophore (related to brachiopods), umm, or it could be an echinoderm, umm, no, it's an ecdysozoan (a group characterised by organisms that shed their external covering), no actually it's a sponge . . . possibly. Alternatively it could belong to a whole new phylum, the Phylum Trilobozoa. Umm, maybe Class Trilobozoa, well, clade trilobozoa anyway.
So its been a question of, "Look! Up in the sky! Is it a lophophore? Is it a cnidarian? No it's . . . , umm . . . , it's . . . , well . . . , it's a Trilobozoan! Yeah . . . , that's what it is, a Trilobozoan.
[voice from the crowd] It's a what?
Trilobozoan.
[voice from the crowd] What's a Trilobozoan?
Glad you asked.
The Trilobozoa are predominately an Ediacaran group who's members have a tripartite or tri-radial body plan, typified by Tribrachidium.
A triumvirate of Trilobozoa. Albumares Brunsae (x4) (left), Anfesta stankovski (x1) (top right) (Photo credit). Rugoconites enigmaticus (x1) (Photo credit) |
The group is a bit of a grab-bag with Albumares and Anfesta from Russia and maybe Rugoconites, as well as some others. The tripartite body plan is almost unique with modern examples confined to teratological (developmental defects) causes. Like Tribrachidium, other trilobozoans are usually found in negative hyporelief and, importantly, although not common, where they do occur in groups they do not overlap, indicating that they are not 'strandings' or simply groups of free swimming forms washed together (otherwise they would overlap).
Tribrachidium, the most common and hence most studied, can also be found in size range of 3 to 30 mm indicating a growth pattern of organisms recruited to the sea floor and growing there, rather than a free swimming form where the sizes would be similar due to current activity. Trilobozans are thought, then, to have been sessile filter feeders, attached to the microbial mats, normally by a bulb-like structure, throughout adult life.
It appears as though the tripartite body plan, or derivatives of it, were quite common in the Ediacaran. Finds such as Ventogyrus are being reinterpreted as a stalked trilobozoan, but placed within the Phylum Cnidaria. Another form, Eoandromeda octobrachiata, though to be related to comb jellyfish (a group of vicious killer jellyfish), is also though to share a number of features in common with Tribrachidium.
So evidence is growing that trilobozoans may well be Cnidarian.
Vicious killer jellyfish, trilobed body plans! The Cnidaria have a lot to answer for!
Trilobozoan Cnidarians? Reconstructed. Tribrachidium stamp (left). Ventogyrus (photo credit) |
It still blows my mind you can look a 400 million year old organism straight in the "face" though still it couldn't be more alien to me... Moar Palaeoporn plzzzz!!!!
ReplyDeleteAnd what is your favourite explaination?
ReplyDeleteHmmm... I can see the superficial resemblance to cyclocystoids and edrioasteriods, and I guess the radial symmetry is suggestive of cnindarian rugosid body form, but why lophophore?
ReplyDeleteThe lophophore link was suggested because some Tribrachidium fossils were found with an interlocking open lattice cover. If you remove one of the three central elements and fuse the cover you end up with a lophophore
ReplyDeleteWhat is an "interlocking open lattice cover"?
ReplyDeleteSee the lines around the outside of the specimen pictured at the start of the piece? In some specimens those lines run right across the specimen and were though to represent an interlocking covering for the animal, but one that is open as the individual elements are not fused together.
ReplyDelete