tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5517176012861550589.post6039370262391557645..comments2023-06-14T21:50:15.221+10:00Comments on Ediacaran: New pits - now with diagrams!Chris Nedinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06978886926715669724noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5517176012861550589.post-7413027837237968332009-02-07T01:20:00.000+11:002009-02-07T01:20:00.000+11:00Chris,Great diagrams, they certainly help me under...Chris,<BR/><BR/>Great diagrams, they certainly help me understand your concept – I can envision how they would shift, move and develop into pits – or any shape for that matter. Good work.Johnnyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04947292290232739954noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5517176012861550589.post-62916494856703923682009-02-01T15:28:00.000+11:002009-02-01T15:28:00.000+11:00Are you applying this equally to both sympatric an...Are you applying this equally to both sympatric and allopatric modes of speciation? My thinking is that the difference between your speciation model and random drift model will be more apparent for the sympatric situation where natural selection may cause a divergence within a population while drift may not. <BR/><BR/>In case of allopatry both natural selection and/ or drift may cause divergence.Suvrat Kherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18281172632784780810noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5517176012861550589.post-84364065390337869502009-01-28T08:26:00.000+11:002009-01-28T08:26:00.000+11:00Oops, fixed. ThanksOops, fixed. ThanksChris Nedinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06978886926715669724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5517176012861550589.post-26317991541253007842009-01-28T07:30:00.000+11:002009-01-28T07:30:00.000+11:00"insipid speciation"...certainly some people feel ..."insipid speciation"...certainly some people feel that way about certain claimed cases of speciation!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5517176012861550589.post-32821516831583541972009-01-27T23:54:00.000+11:002009-01-27T23:54:00.000+11:00Oops -- meant Part "D" at the top... My bad.Oops -- meant Part "D" at the top... My bad.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5517176012861550589.post-53821357217982927162009-01-27T23:53:00.000+11:002009-01-27T23:53:00.000+11:00"insipid" (part C at the top) = "incipient"?"insipid" (part C at the top) = "incipient"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com